Endocriene disruptors

Publicatie uit 2016 >>

Wat vonden ze ervan in 2018 >>

... identified the lack of agreed criteria for the identification of endocrine disruptors as one of the greatest obstacles in the implementation of policy measures aiming to protect human health and the environment from exposure to endocrine disruptors. 2013 >>

Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors 2013 >>

The “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors regarding proposed European Union endocrine disrupter regulations ignores scientific evidence and well-established principles of chemical risk assessment. In this commentary, endocrine disrupter experts express their concerns about a recently published, and is in our considered opinion inaccurate and factually incorrect, editorial that has appeared in several journals in toxicology. Some of the shortcomings of the editorial are discussed in detail. We call for a better founded scientific debate which may help to overcome a polarisation of views detrimental to reaching a consensus about scientific foundations for endocrine disrupter regulation in the EU.

Environmental oestrogens, cosmetics and breast cancer 2006 >>

Effect of environmental chemicals on the genes and the gene expression 2009 >>

Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses 2012 >>

When the dose doens't make the poison: low dose effects & endocrine disrupting chemicals 2012 >>

An International Riposte to Naysayers of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 2013 >>

Bezorgde wetenschappers over endocriene disruptors. 2013 >>

Over een uitgelekt document van de Europese Commissie 2013 >>